"This April, Hope 'Springs' Eternal
for Adoptive Parents"
April 7, 2004
This week I have a good news story to share. It concerns
a rare example of MPs shunning partisan sparring to support
legislation that just makes sense.
I am pleased to report that the legislation that has
appealed to so many Canadians and MPs alike is my Private
Member's Bill, C-246. This legislation would amend Canada's
income tax act to allow a tax deduction for expenses related
to the adoption of a child.
Surprisingly, the words that may best sum up the spirit
of the second hour of debate of my bill last Friday, just
before the House of Commons began its Easter Break, came
from NDP MP Pat Martin, who said, "It is a fitting
way to end the week on such a positive note."
He delivered his enthusiastic endorsement for C-246
and it was echoed by Conservative, New Democrat and Bloc
Quebecois MPs.
However, it's the private expression of support by members
of the Liberal caucus that has given me some measure of
hope for the bill's future. Whether because they simply
see the wisdom in Bill C-246 or because they've been hearing
from so many of their constituents and Canadians who've
written and emailed them on this issue, these backbench
Liberals are not meekly following the "official"
Liberal government rejection of C-246.
Representing the government's position, MP John McKay,
Parliamentary Secretary to the Finance Minister, suggested
an adoption expenses tax deduction would make distinctions
among families and children. He even called the costs
related to adoption "discretionary expenses".
That's like comparing a couple's decision to buy a stereo
to their decision to adopt a child! Often, they have no
alternative when a relative tragically dies leaving children
behind, or following years of unsuccessful and expensive
attempts to conceive a biological child. Many Canadians
feel driven to save special needs, neglected, abused or
orphaned children here in Canada or to literally save
the lives of children from foreign countries.
Regardless of their motives, and the emotional rewards
adoptive parents themselves reap through adoption, all
Canadians benefit from their personal financial expense
- a minimum of $10,000 for a domestic adoption and as
much as $50,000 for an international adoption.
As for the government's assertion that this legislation
would somehow create different classes of families, Bill
C-246 actually strives to correct an inequity in Canada's
tax laws. By doing nothing to mitigate the financial burden
of adoptive parents or to encourage adoption when so many
children are waiting, the federal government itself has
created a separate costly class of adoptive families.
Private Member's Business is supposed to be subject
to a "free vote" by MPs. It is my hope that
that the Liberals will respect this Parliamentary tradition
when MPs vote on April 20th on whether to kill C-246 or
send it to the House of Commons Finance Committee for
review.
Should Paul Martin call an election before Bill C-246
winds its way through the Parliamentary process, I gave
notice in the House last Friday that I intend to win my
seat in the next election and I intend to re-introduce
legislation to provide a tax deduction for adoptive parents
in the next Parliament. This is an issue I have no intention
of giving up on.
-30-
|