"Military’s Solution for Keeping
Soldiers Will Drive More Away"
July 14, 2004
Faced with a ‘carrot or stick’ approach to
retaining trained personnel, Canada’s military is
poised to choose the stick.
Canadian Forces personnel levels have dropped to all time
lows. The most obvious part of the problem is that the
federal government hasn’t bothered to invest the
resources needed to boost recruitment. However, the other
factor significantly depleting troop levels is that the
Canadian military can’t hang on to the soldiers
they’ve already got!
It costs roughly $80,000 over eight months just to train
an infantry soldier for battle. Then there’s the
cost of university, college and other specialized courses
needed to train qualified technicians, engineers, medic,
etc. whom are critical to carrying out our military operations
and operating highly-sophisticated equipment.
In return for getting their university education paid
for by the Canadian Forces, for example, personnel must
commit to at least three years of military service. Fortunately,
the investment pays off in many cases, when soldiers continue
their military career for longer than that, sometimes
for many, many years.
Yet increasingly, many of the military’s best and
brightest are getting out ‘as fast as they can’,
meaning the armed forces loses desperately-needed trained
soldiers. This leaves a gaping hold in operational exercises
and even fewer experienced personnel to train newcomers.
It’s a problem that urgently needs addressing, but
the military’s approach demonstrates it doesn’t
understand it’s in the midst of a morale crisis.
Instead of trying to make new recruits want to remain
in the military, they want to simply make them stay longer.
Military staff have been ordered to report by the end
of this month, the number of years each soldier must serve
in order to cover the entire cost of their training.
Many soldiers know what they’re getting into when
they embark on a life of serving their country. In exchange
for their free training and/or education, they must be
willing to accept relatively low pay, long hours, months
away from home and frequent uprooting of their families.
They’re not prepared however for what I believe
is a profound lack of respect and appreciation for their
hard work and dedication by their political masters in
the Liberal government.
Any Canadian worker can relate. Loyalty to the job is
difficult to maintain when your boss continues to cut
back on your budget, forces you to make do with broken-down
equipment or no equipment at all, and provides you with
so few staff that sometimes you can’t even do your
job. The number of currently serving members and veterans
who regularly contact my office regarding their legitimate
grievances has helped to demonstrate to me that Canada
doesn’t always do enough to take care of its soldiers.
Even CF members who had originally chosen to remain longer
than their obligatory number of years of service are now
choosing to take early retirement or find work in the
private sector.
If the Canadian government really wants the men and women
of our armed forces to continue to serve their country,
it should start by enticing them with respect, acknowledgement,
and the support that they need make their chosen career
a fulfilling and rewarding experience.
|