"PM Paul Preoccupied with Picking
the Perfect Day at the Polls"
March 17, 2004
Pity poor Paul Martin. He's been Prime Minister for just
over three months and already the honeymoon is over.
His first exhausting weeks in power have been spent dodging
and ducking his government's myriad of scandals. But what's
really been keeping Paul Martin up at night with worry
is not healthcare, not the devastating beef and softwood
lumber crises, nor the thought of sending our overstretched
and under-equipped troops into harm's way. No, what is
currently consuming the PM and the resources of the entire
Liberal government is the critical, pressing decision
of when to call an election to ensure that they can hang
onto power.
I'd like to offer some analysis on the question of an
early election date in order to help expedite the decision
since, like most Canadians, I would prefer to see the
Prime Minister concentrate on the business of the nation.
The Pros (for Paul Martin) of an early election
1. Catch the Conservative Party of Canada unprepared.
The longer the CPC has to solidify its grassroots policies
and organization, the better prepared it will be for an
election.
2. The possibility of facing off against an inexperienced
CPC leader. Paul Martin could immediately pounce upon
Tony Clement or Belinda Stronach before they're ready
just as Jean Chretien did with Stockwell Day.
3. Get it over with before the "really bad stuff"
is dug up by reporters, opposition MPs, Parliamentary
committees and the public inquiry investigating the sponsorship
scandal.
4. Claim that a new Prime Minister needs a fresh start.
The longer he waits, it will become even less credible
for Paul Martin to portray himself as "new"
and to distance himself from Jean Chretien.
5. A full election warchest. The Liberal Party coffers
should be filled after the need for an expensive leadership
race was avoided by Paul Martin's "coronation".
'The Cons' of an early election
1. The Canadian electorate is still very angry about
the sponsorship scandal and other scandals coming to light
every day.
2. The PM will appear "too afraid" to face
the embarrassing outcome of the scandal inquiry.
3. Risks backlash for continuing the Jean Chretian legacy
of calling early, unnecessary and expensive elections
- long before the official mandate expires.
4. The Liberal Party will find it hard to fight an election
while Paul Martin supporters and Jean Chretien loyalists
continue to fight it out in the backrooms.
Since it's obvious that Paul Martin needs help facing
this "tremendous" decision, I have a proposal
that I've advocated throughout the 15 years I've been
involved in politics
a suggestion that will completely
remove this burden from our beleaguered PM
fixed
election dates.
Without the need to determine the "perfect election
date", just imagine how much time Paul Martin and
the Liberals would have to restore our crippled healthcare
system, bring relief to beef farmers and negotiate with
the U.S. a settlement to the softwood lumber dispute.
Instead of playing "election roulette", the
Prime Minister could actually focus on governing the country.
-30-
|