The Kind of Days Worth Fighting For
June 8, 2005
Opposition supply days are back! Allow me a few moments
of your time to explain why this matters to Canadians.
First, the Liberal government’s decision to refuse
opposition parties these supply days was in large part
responsible for the recent crisis of confidence in the
House of Commons. Why?
Opposition supply days are crucial to free, open and
democratic debate. The government, especially a minority
one, cannot possibly represent the interests of all Canadians.
Supply days are a powerful tool to ensure important issues
or policy ideas that the government hasn’t addressed
in its legislative agenda can be advanced in Parliament
by the opposition parties.
Many supply day motions are non-partisan in nature, often
proposed at the request of national associations or other
groups.
This week, health advocacy groups across Canada expressed
their gratitude to Conservative MPs for our supply motion
that called upon the government to fully fund and implement
national strategies for cancer, mental health and heart
disease.
Also awaiting debate is our motion to update the definition
of ‘caregiver’ to ensure access to the federal
Compassionate Care benefit is less restrictive. This is
an increasingly important measure as our population ages
and our healthcare system relies more heavily upon care
at home by family and friends.
A Conservative motion seeking to introduce a National
Disability Act is designed to promote reasonable access
to medical care, equipment, education, employment, transportation
and housing for Canadians with disabilities.
Another Conservative motion in the queue aims to address
the high incidence of poverty, teen suicide and substance
abuse among Canadian aboriginals, and to improve access
to healthcare and education, particularly for aboriginal
children.
Canada’s recent poor environmental ratings by international
organizations, including the United Nations, means Conservative
MPs are eager to debate our motion calling upon the government
establish a comprehensive environmental vision to provide
clean air, land and water with a focus on the development
of alternate energy and transitional fuels.
I tabled my own supply day motion proposing to modernize
the antiquated Divorce Act based upon the recommendations
of the 1998 Senate-House of Commons report For the Sake
of the Children, thereby ensuring children have access
to both parents through the principle of shared-parenting.
Other Conservative supply day motions propose to make
the registry of all convicted sex offenders mandatory
and retroactive; to re-direct funds from the Canadian
Firearms Centre to the RCMP and the Canada Border Services
Agency; to increase spending for the Canadian Forces;
and to increase agricultural producers’ access to
international niche markets by providing Canadian processors
access to voluntary BSE testing for export certification.
I don’t have room in this space to list all the
opposition supply motions which have been introduced.
Suffice it to say, they include a wide-variety of credible
initiatives worthy of consideration by your elected representatives.
It’s a sad indication of the Liberal government’s
disregard for democracy that the Official Opposition had
to fight so hard to restore our right to raise these issues
on your behalf.
-30-
|